As seen in USA Today, MSNBC, Dr. Oz, and the Chicago Tribune.

$type=ticker$count=12$cols=4$cate=0$sn=0

Key Long Island County Rejects Coal Tar Sealant Use

Earlier today Suffolk County, New York with a robust population near 1.5 million, passed a ban on the use and sale of coal tar pavement se...

Earlier today Suffolk County, New York with a robust population near 1.5 million, passed a ban on the use and sale of coal tar pavement sealants.  This ban marks the second county in the United States to do so.  Under the leadership of the Suffolk County Legislature Presiding Officer William J. Lindsay, the bill passed the Suffolk County Legislature.

“Suffolk County is proud to join the communities across this country and indeed across the world that have banned coal tar-based sealcoats,” said Lindsay.  “With effective alternatives readily available, there is no reason to allow the use of coal tar-based sealants, which contain large amounts of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and have been proven to be dangerous to humans and a severe threat to marine life of virtually every variety. I hope this will be another step in encouraging the Environmental Protection Agency to ban the use of coal tar-based sealcoats nation-wide.”

With a long standing tradition of leadership on environmental rules, the Legislature passed the resolution that will go into effect January 1, 2012.  Penalties for the first violation will be $500 and $750 for subsequent ones.  The text of the bill as it was at the time of this writing is located here.

Suffolk County, while more populated than 10 states, ranks as one of the highest in New York agricultural production.  The area is also well-known for its parks and beaches.

This blog covered the introduction of this bill a few weeks ago and can be read at this link.
The passage of this ban raises the population of the US that is under a coal tar sealant ban up to over 10.2 million people.

COMMENTS

BLOGGER: 1
Loading...

video playlist

Name

2016,49,ABC's,8,Action,53,airport,3,alternatives,6,Althoff,1,AMA,1,American Coating Association,2,Anacostia,1,Andover,1,applicator,1,APWA,1,ASCE,1,Asphalt Institute,1,ASTM,1,Austin,27,Austin Chronicle,1,ban,135,bans,5,Baylor,9,benzo[a]pyrene,1,Boca Raton,1,Boone,3,Burke,1,California,11,CalTrans,1,Canada,6,cancer,23,Cheh,1,Chesapeake Bay,1,Chicago,7,Chicago Sun Times,1,Chicago Tribune,7,china,1,Cleveland,2,coffee-tea test,3,Congress,6,Connecticut,2,consumer,1,cost,11,costs,1,Dallas,1,Dane County,1,Data Quality,1,Daughtry,4,DC,1,DDT,1,Deep Water Horizon,1,Delaware,1,Department of Defense,1,Department of Interior,2,District of Columbia,7,Doggett,17,DuPage River Salt Creek,2,Ed Burke,1,Edwards Aquifer Authority,3,Ellison,2,Emancipation,1,enforcement,6,environmental justice,1,EPA,31,EU,1,FAA,6,FAQ,14,field test,1,fish kill,3,Florida,2,Frockt,2,German Federation,1,Gowanus,2,Great Lakes,4,Gregoire,1,Hansen,4,Hawthorne,2,health,62,Hoffman Estates,1,Home Depot,1,Huffman,7,IARC,1,Illinois,27,Indiana,2,industry,68,Jeffords,1,Kansas,3,Keating,2,Lindsay,2,Long Island,1,Lowes,1,Mackerer,1,Madison,1,Maine,9,map,2,Maryland,8,Massachusetts,3,McDermott,1,McHenry,1,McHenry County,2,MCPA,1,Men's Health,1,Michigan,9,Milwaukee,1,Minneapolis,1,Minnesota,32,Mississippi River,2,Missouri,6,Montgomery County,3,Morgan State,1,MPCA,23,MS4,1,MSDS,1,MSNBC,2,national pavement contractors association,1,National Research Council,1,New Hampshire,4,New York,14,New York Academy of Sciences,1,Niezgodski,1,NOAA,1,North Carolina,3,npca,1,NPDES,1,Ohio,2,Oklahoma,1,OSHA,1,PCTC,2,Pennsylvania,1,Pets,1,Physicians for Social Responsibility,4,price comparison,6,Quigley,2,Quinoline,1,Reader's Digest,2,Regs,6,relative potency factor,1,Republican,1,Rice,1,Rocky River,1,Rodale,2,Rosenthal,3,RT-12,1,San Antonio,7,San Diego,1,Scalze,3,schools,8,Science,57,shotblasting,3,Sierra Club,1,Sisisky,2,Slavins,1,Smoking,2,South Barrington,1,South Carolina,1,Springfield,7,Stormwater Magazine,1,Suffolk,2,Suffolk County,3,Texas,4,The Doctors TV Show,1,Today Show,1,Tom Bashara,3,Toronto,2,tribute,1,TSCA,2,Twitter,9,UConn,2,University of Michigan,1,US Department of Health and Human Services,1,USA TODAY,3,USGS,43,Video,18,Wall Street Journal,1,Walmart,1,Warner,1,Washington,8,Washington Environmental Council,2,Washington State University,1,Watauga Riverkeepers,1,WEF,3,wetland regulations,1,Wieckowski,1,williams,2,Winfield,2,Wisconsin,3,z2014,31,z2014 Summary,14,
ltr
item
Coal Tar Free America: Key Long Island County Rejects Coal Tar Sealant Use
Key Long Island County Rejects Coal Tar Sealant Use
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-hem0db1PcBU/Te4PINx_0TI/AAAAAAAABd0/Lnpmk6nD9Qg/s320/jumping+beach+2.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-hem0db1PcBU/Te4PINx_0TI/AAAAAAAABd0/Lnpmk6nD9Qg/s72-c/jumping+beach+2.jpg
Coal Tar Free America
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/2011/06/key-long-island-county-rejects-coal-tar.html
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/2011/06/key-long-island-county-rejects-coal-tar.html
true
5212735001005847783
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy