As seen in USA Today, MSNBC, Dr. Oz, and the Chicago Tribune.

$type=ticker$count=12$cols=4$cate=0$sn=0

Cleanup Costs "Huge Problem;" Drives Another Minnesota Town Toward a Coal Tar Sealant Ban

With more municipal coal tar sealant bans than any other state in the US, another Minnesota community is moving toward passage of a ban.  T...

With more municipal coal tar sealant bans than any other state in the US, another Minnesota community is moving toward passage of a ban.  The real cost of disposing dredged sediment from retention ponds has led the City of Inver Grove Heights to begin the process to pass a ban. 

According to an article in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, Inver Grove Heights found that 25% of their tested stormwater ponds (3 out of 12) showed the presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH's).  The sediment from two of the ponds would have to go to a landfill at a cost of $180,000 to $200,000.  The problem is that Inver Grove Heights has 578 stormwater ponds.

"Every city is in the same situation -- it's a huge problem," said White Bear Lake public works director Mark Burch.  White Bear Lake was the first Minnesota community to pass a coal tar sealant ban.

It is reasonable to expect these high levels are caused by coal tar sealant pollution.  "Data we have collected over the last year indicate that there is a good percentage of these pollutants tied to coal-tar sealants," said Don Berger of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.  It is estimated that there are over 20,000 stormwater ponds in the Twin Cities area under MS4 permitting, but there are many more private ponds at private facilities and under homeowner association control.

So it seems that industry's solution to the problem of coal tar sealant pollution, stormwater ponds, doesn't really work.  It just delays and moves the cost burden to someone else.  Time to try something else: complete elimination of this product.

COMMENTS

Stay informed...Get FREE updates on new coal tar bans!

* indicates required

Google Search of this Site

Name

2016,49,ABC's,8,Action,53,airport,3,alternatives,6,Althoff,1,AMA,1,American Coating Association,2,Anacostia,1,Andover,1,applicator,1,APWA,1,ASCE,1,Asphalt Institute,1,ASTM,1,Austin,27,Austin Chronicle,1,ban,135,bans,5,Baylor,9,benzo[a]pyrene,1,Boca Raton,1,Boone,3,Burke,1,California,11,CalTrans,1,Canada,6,cancer,23,Cheh,1,Chesapeake Bay,1,Chicago,7,Chicago Sun Times,1,Chicago Tribune,7,china,1,Cleveland,2,coffee-tea test,3,Congress,6,Connecticut,2,consumer,1,cost,11,costs,1,Dallas,1,Dane County,1,Data Quality,1,Daughtry,4,DC,1,DDT,1,Deep Water Horizon,1,Delaware,1,Department of Defense,1,Department of Interior,2,District of Columbia,7,Doggett,17,DuPage River Salt Creek,2,Ed Burke,1,Edwards Aquifer Authority,3,Ellison,2,Emancipation,1,enforcement,6,environmental justice,1,EPA,31,EU,1,FAA,6,FAQ,14,field test,1,fish kill,3,Florida,2,Frockt,2,German Federation,1,Gowanus,2,Great Lakes,4,Gregoire,1,Hansen,4,Hawthorne,2,health,62,Hoffman Estates,1,Home Depot,1,Huffman,7,IARC,1,Illinois,27,Indiana,2,industry,68,Jeffords,1,Kansas,3,Keating,2,Lindsay,2,Long Island,1,Lowes,1,Mackerer,1,Madison,1,Maine,9,map,2,Maryland,8,Massachusetts,3,McDermott,1,McHenry,1,McHenry County,2,MCPA,1,Men's Health,1,Michigan,9,Milwaukee,1,Minneapolis,1,Minnesota,32,Mississippi River,2,Missouri,6,Montgomery County,3,Morgan State,1,MPCA,23,MS4,1,MSDS,1,MSNBC,2,national pavement contractors association,1,National Research Council,1,New Hampshire,4,New York,14,New York Academy of Sciences,1,Niezgodski,1,NOAA,1,North Carolina,3,npca,1,NPDES,1,Ohio,2,Oklahoma,1,OSHA,1,PCTC,2,Pennsylvania,1,Pets,1,Physicians for Social Responsibility,4,price comparison,6,Quigley,2,Quinoline,1,Reader's Digest,2,Regs,6,relative potency factor,1,Republican,1,Rice,1,Rocky River,1,Rodale,2,Rosenthal,3,RT-12,1,San Antonio,7,San Diego,1,Scalze,3,schools,8,Science,57,shotblasting,3,Sierra Club,1,Sisisky,2,Slavins,1,Smoking,2,South Barrington,1,South Carolina,1,Springfield,7,Stormwater Magazine,1,Suffolk,2,Suffolk County,3,Texas,4,The Doctors TV Show,1,Today Show,1,Tom Bashara,3,Toronto,2,tribute,1,TSCA,2,Twitter,9,UConn,2,University of Michigan,1,US Department of Health and Human Services,1,USA TODAY,3,USGS,43,Video,18,Wall Street Journal,1,Walmart,1,Warner,1,Washington,8,Washington Environmental Council,2,Washington State University,1,Watauga Riverkeepers,1,WEF,3,wetland regulations,1,Wieckowski,1,williams,2,Winfield,2,Wisconsin,3,z2014,31,z2014 Summary,14,
ltr
item
Coal Tar Free America: Cleanup Costs "Huge Problem;" Drives Another Minnesota Town Toward a Coal Tar Sealant Ban
Cleanup Costs "Huge Problem;" Drives Another Minnesota Town Toward a Coal Tar Sealant Ban
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-do2_LTWXbOY/TqOdkWVG6WI/AAAAAAAABrE/E7tNAHtbpz8/s640/money+piles.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-do2_LTWXbOY/TqOdkWVG6WI/AAAAAAAABrE/E7tNAHtbpz8/s72-c/money+piles.jpg
Coal Tar Free America
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/2011/10/cleanup-costs-huge-problem-drives.html
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/2011/10/cleanup-costs-huge-problem-drives.html
true
5212735001005847783
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy