As seen in USA Today, MSNBC, Dr. Oz, and the Chicago Tribune.

$type=ticker$count=12$cols=4$cate=0$sn=0

Busting Sealant Myths: "Flawed" USGS Studies

That old saying that a lie is halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on has never been truer than with this myth.  Dozens...

That old saying that a lie is halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on has never been truer than with this myth.  Dozens of times industry representatives and scientists have made this claim.  Some have even begun to add colorful modifiers like "grossly flawed" or "seriously flawed."  Maybe they think the longer and louder it is said will make it come true.

Recently I reread this complaint made by industry against the United States Geological Survey (USGS).  If you're new to this issue, the USGS is an independent research unit of the federal government.  They have led several studies about coal tar pavement sealant pollution.  The complaint was made about a 2004 report by a law firm representing 10 industry-related companies under the Information Quality Act.

The complaint contains about 45 comments or issues made, but none of them are of any real consequence.  Some of them were discussions about rounding numbers and others had to do with terminology.  Most required no revisions; while many included some revisions to clarify certain statements.    One complaint was even against using the term "coal tar" to describe a sealant, which is commonly used by applicators and producers.  The term continues to evolve as the industry looks for a sanitized term for their product.

I would encourage anyone to read it for themselves here.

A news release from the USGS is still on the web that says:
The revisions do not change the scientific results of the study or the data presented.
"No data were changed, and none of the additions or revisions have any effect on the scientific conclusions of the study," explained Dr. Barbara Mahler, lead author of the report
http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1642&from=rss

Isn't it amazing that the industry continues to describe the reports as "grossly flawed" in light of these statements?

COMMENTS

Stay informed...Get FREE updates on new coal tar bans!

* indicates required

Google Search of this Site

Name

2016,49,ABC's,8,Action,53,airport,3,alternatives,6,Althoff,1,AMA,1,American Coating Association,2,Anacostia,1,Andover,1,applicator,1,APWA,1,ASCE,1,Asphalt Institute,1,ASTM,1,Austin,27,Austin Chronicle,1,ban,135,bans,5,Baylor,9,benzo[a]pyrene,1,Boca Raton,1,Boone,3,Burke,1,California,11,CalTrans,1,Canada,6,cancer,23,Cheh,1,Chesapeake Bay,1,Chicago,7,Chicago Sun Times,1,Chicago Tribune,7,china,1,Cleveland,2,coffee-tea test,3,Congress,6,Connecticut,2,consumer,1,cost,11,costs,1,Dallas,1,Dane County,1,Data Quality,1,Daughtry,4,DC,1,DDT,1,Deep Water Horizon,1,Delaware,1,Department of Defense,1,Department of Interior,2,District of Columbia,7,Doggett,17,DuPage River Salt Creek,2,Ed Burke,1,Edwards Aquifer Authority,3,Ellison,2,Emancipation,1,enforcement,6,environmental justice,1,EPA,31,EU,1,FAA,6,FAQ,14,field test,1,fish kill,3,Florida,2,Frockt,2,German Federation,1,Gowanus,2,Great Lakes,4,Gregoire,1,Hansen,4,Hawthorne,2,health,62,Hoffman Estates,1,Home Depot,1,Huffman,7,IARC,1,Illinois,27,Indiana,2,industry,68,Jeffords,1,Kansas,3,Keating,2,Lindsay,2,Long Island,1,Lowes,1,Mackerer,1,Madison,1,Maine,9,map,2,Maryland,8,Massachusetts,3,McDermott,1,McHenry,1,McHenry County,2,MCPA,1,Men's Health,1,Michigan,9,Milwaukee,1,Minneapolis,1,Minnesota,32,Mississippi River,2,Missouri,6,Montgomery County,3,Morgan State,1,MPCA,23,MS4,1,MSDS,1,MSNBC,2,national pavement contractors association,1,National Research Council,1,New Hampshire,4,New York,14,New York Academy of Sciences,1,Niezgodski,1,NOAA,1,North Carolina,3,npca,1,NPDES,1,Ohio,2,Oklahoma,1,OSHA,1,PCTC,2,Pennsylvania,1,Pets,1,Physicians for Social Responsibility,4,price comparison,6,Quigley,2,Quinoline,1,Reader's Digest,2,Regs,6,relative potency factor,1,Republican,1,Rice,1,Rocky River,1,Rodale,2,Rosenthal,3,RT-12,1,San Antonio,7,San Diego,1,Scalze,3,schools,8,Science,57,shotblasting,3,Sierra Club,1,Sisisky,2,Slavins,1,Smoking,2,South Barrington,1,South Carolina,1,Springfield,7,Stormwater Magazine,1,Suffolk,2,Suffolk County,3,Texas,4,The Doctors TV Show,1,Today Show,1,Tom Bashara,3,Toronto,2,tribute,1,TSCA,2,Twitter,9,UConn,2,University of Michigan,1,US Department of Health and Human Services,1,USA TODAY,3,USGS,43,Video,18,Wall Street Journal,1,Walmart,1,Warner,1,Washington,8,Washington Environmental Council,2,Washington State University,1,Watauga Riverkeepers,1,WEF,3,wetland regulations,1,Wieckowski,1,williams,2,Winfield,2,Wisconsin,3,z2014,31,z2014 Summary,14,
ltr
item
Coal Tar Free America: Busting Sealant Myths: "Flawed" USGS Studies
Busting Sealant Myths: "Flawed" USGS Studies
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OB6Qq1xb94c/TxJaySdzfqI/AAAAAAAAB64/S3qXCWIGoOQ/s400/corn+cob+lady.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OB6Qq1xb94c/TxJaySdzfqI/AAAAAAAAB64/S3qXCWIGoOQ/s72-c/corn+cob+lady.jpg
Coal Tar Free America
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/2012/01/busting-sealant-myths-flawed-usgs.html
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/2012/01/busting-sealant-myths-flawed-usgs.html
true
5212735001005847783
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy