As seen in USA Today, MSNBC, Dr. Oz, and the Chicago Tribune.


Landing on the Truth About the FAA and Coal Tar Sealers

The frequent question comes up in a discussion of coal tar sealants is "what about our airport and the Federal Aviation Authority (FA...

The frequent question comes up in a discussion of coal tar sealants is "what about our airport and the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA)?  Don't we have to use coal tar sealants?"  The short answer is "no," but read on if you want to know why.

This misunderstanding is so pervasive, that some have even stated that airports might lose their federal funding unless they use coal tar.  While I won't get into the politics of procurement, it is safe to say that not only do airports around the country use other materials besides coal tar sealants, but many have been looking for alternatives for a very long time.


The reason that coal tar sealants have been historically used at airports is their fuel resistance.  If you remember your chemistry class taught you that "like dissolves like," then you'll understand that asphalt (a petroleum by-product) is damaged by fuel (a petroleum by-product) leaks from aircraft.  Airport can't afford to have deteriorating pavement both for structural strength and also to minimize any debris on the field that might get sucked up in an engine.

However, there are problems with coal tar sealants and fuel resistance and it has nothing to do with environmental or human health issues.  Several sources cite pavement damage when coal tar sealants crack and allow jet fuel to sit in the cracks and deteriorate the pavement.  The first entitled "Fuel Resistant Sealers and Binders for HMA Airfield Pavements (2009)," is a study of fuel resistant surface treatments.  It says that differential expansion and contraction of a coal tar sealants leads to cracking (p.1).  The study, while not approved by the FAA, was funded by the FAA.

The second source is the Army Corps of Engineers that found this same cracking phenomenon.  This report is: "Rejuvenators, Rejuvenator/Sealers, and Seal Coats for Airfield Pavements (2003)."


When the City of Austin passed the nation's first coal tar sealcoat ban, language was included that gives the airport an out if they couldn't find a suitable product to replace coal tar at their most critical location, the aircraft parking areas.  This is where a lot of fuel drips from the planes and fuel resistance is critical.   This is a VERY small percentage of the area sealed at the airport.

Since then the FAA has done research and has found products that can stand up to fuel drips. Several sealants were found to perform well.

Recently hot mix asphalt designs, dubbed "FRA" or "fuel resistant asphalt," have been used at several airports. So instead of being dependent on a surface treatment to protect an asphalt surface, the asphalt pavement is modified to itself be fuel resistant. How well does that work? Well enough that the military and the FAA are looking include this in their standard specifications.

Other airports around the country have used alternatives to coal tar sealants.  The San Francisco Airport, the John Wayne Airport (Orange County, CA) successfully used  a fuel resistant product  as well.   More on this particular product can be found at this link.

Since 2005 the Austin-Bergstrom International Airport has been using only asphalt-based products without any loss in FAA support.

So contrary to what you might hear, there are suitable alternatives to coal tar sealants being used today at airports around the country.  All without any loss in funding or support from the FAA.


Stay informed...Get FREE updates on new coal tar bans!

* indicates required

Google Search of this Site


2016,49,ABC's,8,Action,53,airport,3,alternatives,6,Althoff,1,AMA,1,American Coating Association,2,Anacostia,1,Andover,1,applicator,1,APWA,1,ASCE,1,Asphalt Institute,1,ASTM,1,Austin,27,Austin Chronicle,1,ban,135,bans,5,Baylor,9,benzo[a]pyrene,1,Boca Raton,1,Boone,3,Burke,1,California,11,CalTrans,1,Canada,6,cancer,23,Cheh,1,Chesapeake Bay,1,Chicago,7,Chicago Sun Times,1,Chicago Tribune,7,china,1,Cleveland,2,coffee-tea test,3,Congress,6,Connecticut,2,consumer,1,cost,11,costs,1,Dallas,1,Dane County,1,Data Quality,1,Daughtry,4,DC,1,DDT,1,Deep Water Horizon,1,Delaware,1,Department of Defense,1,Department of Interior,2,District of Columbia,7,Doggett,17,DuPage River Salt Creek,2,Ed Burke,1,Edwards Aquifer Authority,3,Ellison,2,Emancipation,1,enforcement,6,environmental justice,1,EPA,31,EU,1,FAA,6,FAQ,14,field test,1,fish kill,3,Florida,2,Frockt,2,German Federation,1,Gowanus,2,Great Lakes,4,Gregoire,1,Hansen,4,Hawthorne,2,health,62,Hoffman Estates,1,Home Depot,1,Huffman,7,IARC,1,Illinois,27,Indiana,2,industry,68,Jeffords,1,Kansas,3,Keating,2,Lindsay,2,Long Island,1,Lowes,1,Mackerer,1,Madison,1,Maine,9,map,2,Maryland,8,Massachusetts,3,McDermott,1,McHenry,1,McHenry County,2,MCPA,1,Men's Health,1,Michigan,9,Milwaukee,1,Minneapolis,1,Minnesota,32,Mississippi River,2,Missouri,6,Montgomery County,3,Morgan State,1,MPCA,23,MS4,1,MSDS,1,MSNBC,2,national pavement contractors association,1,National Research Council,1,New Hampshire,4,New York,14,New York Academy of Sciences,1,Niezgodski,1,NOAA,1,North Carolina,3,npca,1,NPDES,1,Ohio,2,Oklahoma,1,OSHA,1,PCTC,2,Pennsylvania,1,Pets,1,Physicians for Social Responsibility,4,price comparison,6,Quigley,2,Quinoline,1,Reader's Digest,2,Regs,6,relative potency factor,1,Republican,1,Rice,1,Rocky River,1,Rodale,2,Rosenthal,3,RT-12,1,San Antonio,7,San Diego,1,Scalze,3,schools,8,Science,57,shotblasting,3,Sierra Club,1,Sisisky,2,Slavins,1,Smoking,2,South Barrington,1,South Carolina,1,Springfield,7,Stormwater Magazine,1,Suffolk,2,Suffolk County,3,Texas,4,The Doctors TV Show,1,Today Show,1,Tom Bashara,3,Toronto,2,tribute,1,TSCA,2,Twitter,9,UConn,2,University of Michigan,1,US Department of Health and Human Services,1,USA TODAY,3,USGS,43,Video,18,Wall Street Journal,1,Walmart,1,Warner,1,Washington,8,Washington Environmental Council,2,Washington State University,1,Watauga Riverkeepers,1,WEF,3,wetland regulations,1,Wieckowski,1,williams,2,Winfield,2,Wisconsin,3,z2014,31,z2014 Summary,14,
Coal Tar Free America: Landing on the Truth About the FAA and Coal Tar Sealers
Landing on the Truth About the FAA and Coal Tar Sealers
Coal Tar Free America
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy