As seen in USA Today, MSNBC, Dr. Oz, and the Chicago Tribune.

$type=ticker$count=12$cols=4$cate=0$sn=0

Show-Me State Study: Coal Tar Sealants Pervasive Stream Problem

A just-released study of coal tar sealants by Missouri State University agrees with other scientific findings across the US and Canada that...

A just-released study of coal tar sealants by Missouri State University agrees with other scientific findings across the US and Canada that coal tar sealants lead to elevated levels of PAH (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) and stream degradation.  The study also found that PAH levels in urban stream sediments exceeded the recommended standard in nearly 46% of streams.  In fact, they exceed the probable effects concentration 3-4 times more often than levels found in Austin, Texas, which passed their ban based upon similar findings.


The study was commissioned by the City of Springfield, Missouri after looking into the problem of coal tar sealants over two years ago.  An ordinance to ban coal tar sealants failed to pass the Council at that time.

Yesterday this study was presented to the Springfield City Council. A copy of this presentation can be found here.  Council discussed what actions, if any, they would take with this new information.  It is unclear at this time, but the Springfield New-Leader reported Councilwoman Rushevsky's following comment:
Councilwoman Cindy Rushefsky, who supported a wider ban two years ago, said she intends to renew the push for a restrictions.
“I think this (study) makes it clear that coal tar is the problem,” she said. “Now the question becomes, what are we gonna do about it?
Absent from the discussion was new information that further debunks industry's claim that stormwater controls are the answer to coal tar sealant pollution in Springfield.  This was their claim 2 years ago.  Not only does the potential construction cost make this unrealistic, but now the State of Minnesota has shown that coal tar sealers can a huge cost burden to clean up and dispose of contaminated sediments.  For the Twin Cities area the estimate is about $1 Billion!

For more on this, see my post, The High Cost of Cheap Coal Tar.





COMMENTS

Name

2016,49,ABC's,8,Action,53,airport,3,alternatives,6,Althoff,1,AMA,1,American Coating Association,2,Anacostia,1,Andover,1,applicator,1,APWA,1,ASCE,1,Asphalt Institute,1,ASTM,1,Austin,27,Austin Chronicle,1,ban,135,bans,5,Baylor,9,benzo[a]pyrene,1,Boca Raton,1,Boone,3,Burke,1,California,11,CalTrans,1,Canada,6,cancer,23,Cheh,1,Chesapeake Bay,1,Chicago,7,Chicago Sun Times,1,Chicago Tribune,7,china,1,Cleveland,2,coffee-tea test,3,Congress,6,Connecticut,2,consumer,1,cost,11,costs,1,Dallas,1,Dane County,1,Data Quality,1,Daughtry,4,DC,1,DDT,1,Deep Water Horizon,1,Delaware,1,Department of Defense,1,Department of Interior,2,District of Columbia,7,Doggett,17,DuPage River Salt Creek,2,Ed Burke,1,Edwards Aquifer Authority,3,Ellison,2,Emancipation,1,enforcement,6,environmental justice,1,EPA,31,EU,1,FAA,6,FAQ,14,field test,1,fish kill,3,Florida,2,Frockt,2,German Federation,1,Gowanus,2,Great Lakes,4,Gregoire,1,Hansen,4,Hawthorne,2,health,62,Hoffman Estates,1,Home Depot,1,Huffman,7,IARC,1,Illinois,27,Indiana,2,industry,68,Jeffords,1,Kansas,3,Keating,2,Lindsay,2,Long Island,1,Lowes,1,Mackerer,1,Madison,1,Maine,9,map,2,Maryland,8,Massachusetts,3,McDermott,1,McHenry,1,McHenry County,2,MCPA,1,Men's Health,1,Michigan,9,Milwaukee,1,Minneapolis,1,Minnesota,32,Mississippi River,2,Missouri,6,Montgomery County,3,Morgan State,1,MPCA,23,MS4,1,MSDS,1,MSNBC,2,national pavement contractors association,1,National Research Council,1,New Hampshire,4,New York,14,New York Academy of Sciences,1,Niezgodski,1,NOAA,1,North Carolina,3,npca,1,NPDES,1,Ohio,2,Oklahoma,1,OSHA,1,PCTC,2,Pennsylvania,1,Pets,1,Physicians for Social Responsibility,4,Quigley,2,Quinoline,1,Reader's Digest,2,Regs,6,relative potency factor,1,Republican,1,Rice,1,Rocky River,1,Rodale,2,Rosenthal,3,RT-12,1,San Antonio,7,San Diego,1,Scalze,3,schools,8,Science,57,shotblasting,3,Sierra Club,1,Sisisky,2,Slavins,1,Smoking,2,South Barrington,1,South Carolina,1,Springfield,7,Stormwater Magazine,1,Suffolk,2,Suffolk County,3,Texas,4,The Doctors TV Show,1,Today Show,1,Tom Bashara,3,Toronto,2,tribute,1,TSCA,2,Twitter,9,UConn,2,University of Michigan,1,US Department of Health and Human Services,1,USA TODAY,3,USGS,43,Video,18,Wall Street Journal,1,Walmart,1,Warner,1,Washington,8,Washington Environmental Council,2,Washington State University,1,Watauga Riverkeepers,1,WEF,3,wetland regulations,1,Wieckowski,1,williams,2,Winfield,2,Wisconsin,3,z2014,31,z2014 Summary,14,
ltr
item
Coal Tar Free America: Show-Me State Study: Coal Tar Sealants Pervasive Stream Problem
Show-Me State Study: Coal Tar Sealants Pervasive Stream Problem
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--MuKepnyfUw/UKPO3XnVkWI/AAAAAAAACno/LZ5-eplDGY0/s640/springfield+summary.JPG
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--MuKepnyfUw/UKPO3XnVkWI/AAAAAAAACno/LZ5-eplDGY0/s72-c/springfield+summary.JPG
Coal Tar Free America
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/2012/11/show-me-state-study-coal-tar-sealants.html
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/
https://coaltarfreeamerica.blogspot.com/2012/11/show-me-state-study-coal-tar-sealants.html
true
5212735001005847783
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy