As seen in USA Today, MSNBC, Dr. Oz, and the Chicago Tribune.


Green Building Gets a Black Eye from Coal Tar

Rating System Fails to Protect Users from Coal Tar Sealcoat Imagine the disappointment to learn that your awesome green building with e...

Rating System Fails to Protect Users from Coal Tar Sealcoat

Imagine the disappointment to learn that your awesome green building with eco-this and low-emitting-that just sealed their parking lot with what you have come to learn is highly toxic, coal tar pavement sealers. Now add to that you are a cancer survivor who is try to limit your exposure to chemicals; plus you don't have the resources to find another place.

That is the situation with a guest writer who is just coming through this situation. Below you'll find her story.

But first a note from me, Tom Ennis, the primary contributor here. I am an accredited professional with the US Green Building Council, who has the last word on the green ratings on buildings called LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design). I have worked with colleagues to get coal tar free standards in different standards and have appreciated the system on projects through the years.

LEED is a good process through the design and construction of a project, but coal tar sealers are never used in the first 6 months to a year in a project. It has failed this resident and likely many more across the country. If LEED wants to protect its reputation, then it should require this to be remediated or revoke the LEED rating. There is a process for that, though never known to be used. A complaint has already been filed by the resident.

The evidence is strong enough that the use of coal tar sealers on ANY LEED project should be grounds for revoking its certification.

And now from the resident:

Green building with a coal tar sealed parking lot.
At least the parking lot doesn't allow smoking and
has a Prius parking in it.
When we are born we are given an empty glass, during the course of our life our glass is filled with the toxins our bodies collect from the air, the water and our food. When it becomes full we may start to see the effects take it’s toll on our bodies.

We trust our neighbors to use products that do not have an ill effect on others or themselves. We need to be informed to make wise decisions. We trust our government to regulate dangerous toxins, at the very least do not use them in public places such as schools, state parks, public beaches. Home Depot and Lowes pulled this product from their shelves. Why are we not all jumping on board? There are safer alternatives.

When a future development presents themselves to a community as being “Eco Friendly”, “LEED Certified” it instills a certain kind of trust in them. I moved into such a place with faith they would use safe products on site. I am a two time cancer survivor. When my “Gold LEED” certified building had our parking lots sealed last month I noticed a very strong odor. I shut my windows and began research. I found many sites concerning coal-tar-based products. I contacted the company who did the project. I was told it was “Tarconite”.

This product has been banned from the states of MN and WA, Washington DC banned it in 2009. Austin, TX has banned it and is removing it from the parking lots of all schools and playgrounds. This product has water soluble properties which in rainy weather may find it’s way down our storm drains into our drinking water, our streams, our lakes and wetlands. My drinking water comes from wells. We have a beautiful little lake near us with many wetland areas. We need to protect and preserve the beauty we have been blessed with.

We cannot for the health of our earth or those who exist on it continue to use toxic products. Move forward to a healthier existence for the future of all.

To A Brighter Future,
[name withheld, Sharon, MA]


Stay informed...Get FREE updates on new coal tar bans!

* indicates required

Google Search of this Site


2016,49,ABC's,8,Action,53,airport,3,alternatives,6,Althoff,1,AMA,1,American Coating Association,2,Anacostia,1,Andover,1,applicator,1,APWA,1,ASCE,1,Asphalt Institute,1,ASTM,1,Austin,27,Austin Chronicle,1,ban,135,bans,5,Baylor,9,benzo[a]pyrene,1,Boca Raton,1,Boone,3,Burke,1,California,11,CalTrans,1,Canada,6,cancer,23,Cheh,1,Chesapeake Bay,1,Chicago,7,Chicago Sun Times,1,Chicago Tribune,7,china,1,Cleveland,2,coffee-tea test,3,Congress,6,Connecticut,2,consumer,1,cost,11,costs,1,Dallas,1,Dane County,1,Data Quality,1,Daughtry,4,DC,1,DDT,1,Deep Water Horizon,1,Delaware,1,Department of Defense,1,Department of Interior,2,District of Columbia,7,Doggett,17,DuPage River Salt Creek,2,Ed Burke,1,Edwards Aquifer Authority,3,Ellison,2,Emancipation,1,enforcement,6,environmental justice,1,EPA,31,EU,1,FAA,6,FAQ,14,field test,1,fish kill,3,Florida,2,Frockt,2,German Federation,1,Gowanus,2,Great Lakes,4,Gregoire,1,Hansen,4,Hawthorne,2,health,62,Hoffman Estates,1,Home Depot,1,Huffman,7,IARC,1,Illinois,27,Indiana,2,industry,68,Jeffords,1,Kansas,3,Keating,2,Lindsay,2,Long Island,1,Lowes,1,Mackerer,1,Madison,1,Maine,9,map,2,Maryland,8,Massachusetts,3,McDermott,1,McHenry,1,McHenry County,2,MCPA,1,Men's Health,1,Michigan,9,Milwaukee,1,Minneapolis,1,Minnesota,32,Mississippi River,2,Missouri,6,Montgomery County,3,Morgan State,1,MPCA,23,MS4,1,MSDS,1,MSNBC,2,national pavement contractors association,1,National Research Council,1,New Hampshire,4,New York,14,New York Academy of Sciences,1,Niezgodski,1,NOAA,1,North Carolina,3,npca,1,NPDES,1,Ohio,2,Oklahoma,1,OSHA,1,PCTC,2,Pennsylvania,1,Pets,1,Physicians for Social Responsibility,4,price comparison,6,Quigley,2,Quinoline,1,Reader's Digest,2,Regs,6,relative potency factor,1,Republican,1,Rice,1,Rocky River,1,Rodale,2,Rosenthal,3,RT-12,1,San Antonio,7,San Diego,1,Scalze,3,schools,8,Science,57,shotblasting,3,Sierra Club,1,Sisisky,2,Slavins,1,Smoking,2,South Barrington,1,South Carolina,1,Springfield,7,Stormwater Magazine,1,Suffolk,2,Suffolk County,3,Texas,4,The Doctors TV Show,1,Today Show,1,Tom Bashara,3,Toronto,2,tribute,1,TSCA,2,Twitter,9,UConn,2,University of Michigan,1,US Department of Health and Human Services,1,USA TODAY,3,USGS,43,Video,18,Wall Street Journal,1,Walmart,1,Warner,1,Washington,8,Washington Environmental Council,2,Washington State University,1,Watauga Riverkeepers,1,WEF,3,wetland regulations,1,Wieckowski,1,williams,2,Winfield,2,Wisconsin,3,z2014,31,z2014 Summary,14,
Coal Tar Free America: Green Building Gets a Black Eye from Coal Tar
Green Building Gets a Black Eye from Coal Tar
Coal Tar Free America
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS PREMIUM Please share to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy